Liberation and Renunciation - 18 - 03¶
The Shloka¶
———
त्याज्यं दोषवदित्येके कर्म प्राहुर्मनीषिणः ।
यज्ञदानतपःकर्म न त्याज्यमिति चापरे ॥
———
Tyājyaṃ doṣavadityeke karma prāhurmanīṣiṇaḥ.
Yajñadānatapaḥkarma na tyājyamiti cāpare.
———
Meaning / Summary¶
This verse highlights the philosophical dilemma concerning actions and their consequences, a central theme in the Bhagavad Gita. It lays the groundwork for Lord Krishna to elaborate on the true meaning of ‘tyaga’ (renunciation or relinquishment), clarifying that it’s not merely the abandonment of all actions, but rather the renunciation of attachment to their fruits, or the abandonment of actions performed with selfish motives. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the distinctions between various forms of renunciation and the inherent value of certain righteous actions.
Some wise persons declare that all actions should be given up as faulty. And others say that acts of sacrifice, charity, and penance should not be given up.
This shloka introduces two distinct schools of thought regarding the nature of renunciation (tyaga) of action. One view holds that all actions are inherently flawed and should therefore be abandoned entirely. The opposing view asserts that specific beneficial actions like sacrifices (yajna), charity (dana), and austerity (tapas) are virtuous and should never be given up. This sets the premise for Krishna’s detailed explanation of different types of renunciation in the verses that follow.
In this verse, Lord Krishna begins to articulate the differing perspectives that exist among philosophers and spiritual seekers regarding the renunciation of action. The first school of thought, referred to by “eke manīṣiṇaḥ” (some wise persons), posits that all actions, without exception, are inherently flawed or tainted by imperfections (“doṣavat”). From this perspective, the path to liberation or spiritual purity would necessitate the complete cessation of all activities, believing that any engagement in action will inevitably lead to further entanglement and negative reactions, thus binding the soul to the material world. The second, opposing school of thought, represented by “apare” (others), contends that certain categories of actions are not only permissible but essential and should never be relinquished. Specifically, they highlight “yajñadānatapaḥkarma” – actions related to sacrifice (yajna), charity (dana), and austerity (tapas). These are considered righteous and purifying actions that contribute to spiritual progress, societal welfare, and the maintenance of cosmic order. Those who hold this view believe that such actions are meritorious and purify the individual, thus they should not be abandoned. This verse doesn’t offer Krishna’s final judgment but merely presents the prevailing divergent opinions, setting the stage for His profound and nuanced resolution on the true nature of ‘sannyasa’ (renunciation) and ‘tyaga’ (relinquishment) in the subsequent verses of this chapter.
Sentence - 1¶
———
त्याज्यं दोषवदित्येके कर्म प्राहुर्मनीषिणः
———
Meaning¶
Some wise persons declare that actions should be given up as faulty.
Meaning of Words¶
त्याज्यं | Tyājyaṃ | |
To be renounced; to be abandoned. | ||
दोषवत् | Doṣavat | |
As faulty; with defect; imperfect. | ||
इति | Iti | Thus; that. |
एके | Eke | |
Some; certain ones. | ||
कर्म | Karma | |
Action; work; duty. | ||
प्राहुः | Prāhuḥ | |
They say; they declare. | ||
मनीषिणः | Manīṣiṇaḥ | |
Wise persons; learned ones; thinkers. | ||
Sentence - 2¶
———
यज्ञदानतपःकर्म न त्याज्यमिति चापरे ॥
———
Meaning¶
And others say that acts of sacrifice, charity, and penance should not be given up.
Meaning of Words¶
यज्ञदानतपःकर्म | Yajñadānatapaḥkarma | |
Actions of sacrifice, charity, and austerity. | ||
न | Na | Not. |
त्याज्यम् | Tyājyam | |
To be renounced; to be abandoned. | ||
च | Ca | And; also. |
अपरे | Apare | |
Others; another group. | ||